View Full Version : Does a higher resolution help with long range targeting?
icehollowpoint
8th February 2008, 06:26 PM
I always wondered if playing at a higher resolution helped with "bullsh!t" shots?
I play at 1024x768 , just wondering if anyone can confirm higher resolution has enabled them to perform those kind of shots at longer ranges?
GruAncH
8th February 2008, 06:36 PM
Good question its prolly easier to pixel shoot at a lower resolution than a higher but when scoping at range I have noticed with a lower sesitivity mouse it's harder to centralise a headshot it's always slighty either side
EvilRooter
8th February 2008, 08:47 PM
My call is yes. The higher the better, maxed out on my 24" screen
Uncle_Darth
8th February 2008, 08:47 PM
i play at 1680x1050 and it doesnt make me a better shot.
took quite some time to get used to the change in resolution but i wouldnt say it makes you a better shot although you can see more things much better.
EvilRooter
8th February 2008, 09:10 PM
true, maybe not so much a better shot, maybe better situationally aware, from being able to see better
1rankman
8th February 2008, 09:21 PM
id say that tanking with better the screen and graphics the better you can see
i no this is im about to sell my computer with a 5600 nivda and i got and used a 8800gts and you cant see people past 500meter (something like that)
but its better to have bad graphics looking in to long grass
pirogoth
8th February 2008, 10:35 PM
i found tht the game crashes more for me if its above 1024x768. i have no idea why tho.
Captain_Wolf
8th February 2008, 11:53 PM
GFX card overheating?
ThePhotoshop
9th February 2008, 12:10 AM
I used to be pretty average when it came to raw kills on the scoreboard. But then I got my new PC (towards the end of 0.5 / beginning of 0.6) and I consistently topped the scoreboard and took down nearly every opponent I came across.
Higher resolutions are a godsend, but equally so are higher framerates. If you've got a constant 60FPS and above, you're already at an advantage.
wolffy.au
9th February 2008, 12:16 AM
My new PC is running 1920 x 1200 on a 24" LCD with 60-90 fps depending on the map:
1 - its a lot more prettier but as mentioned by 1rankman, you now lose sight of people in long grass, etc
2- IMHO higher fps is a lot more advantageous than higher resolution
3 - it hasn't made me a better shot at all
bishos30
9th February 2008, 12:34 AM
No.
CHARGER_76
9th February 2008, 02:05 AM
I cant hit nothin anymore.... :(
Slavak
9th February 2008, 08:32 AM
1280x1024. But framerate is way more important than reso. A larger resolution scales everything up so targets become bigger ect, but if your card cant handle it then higher fps >> higher resolution.
vBulletin v3.6.0, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.